If you believe that being gay is hardwired and unchangeable but insist that male and female are merely social constructs and that folks can change their “gender identities” from one day to the next, there’s a good chance you are a Progressive Democrat.
Category: War
Man Who Self-Identifies As A Bear Found Bear Community Highly Intolerant | John Hawkins’ Right Wing News
“This sets us back a lot of years,” said tolerance professor Lisette Cornell, Ph.D. of the University of Maryland. Cornell is petitioning to have bears categorized as a hate group until they show themselves to be more progressive in their view of people’s lifestyle choices. “There’s just no excuse for what those bears did. It’s barbaric.”
Wonder if it would be insensitive to LMAO?
Articles: Redefining ‘Transgenderism’ as Normal Behavior
“Our greatest accomplishment on the Working Group was reconceptualizing the state of ‘being trans’ from a mental illness to a normal human variant.”
Your greatest accomplishment was to show that the American Psychiatric Association as a whole is mentally ill and not to be trusted.
Source: Articles: Redefining ‘Transgenderism’ as Normal Behavior
Sultan Knish: You’re a Bad Man, Governor Brown
Why do Pelosi, Low, Brown and the ACLU hate Charlie Brown?
Baby becomes world’s first to have gender marked ‘unknown’
The baby’s parent, Kori Doty, does not identify as male or female and prefers to use the pronoun ‘they’, and wants to raise Searyl’s genderless until the baby has a “sense of self and command of vocabulary to tell me who they are.”
Doty wants to keep Searyl’s gender off of all official records until that day, according to CBC.
The face of mental illness…
This is also child abuse.
Source: Baby becomes world’s first to have gender marked ‘unknown’
Biological Reality is Now Unconstitutional | The Political Hat
From the comments:
“What a stupid world we live in. As soon as there are space colonies, everyone sane needs to get off this rock and then slap a quarantine on Earth to keep the idiocy contained.”
Source: Biological Reality is Now Unconstitutional | The Political Hat
The big list of failed climate predictions | Watts Up With That?
FAILED CLIMATE PREDICTIONS (and some related stupid sayings)
Source: The big list of failed climate predictions | Watts Up With That?
When Too Little CO2 Nearly Doomed Humanity – Dennis Avery
Our crop plants evolved about 400 million years ago, when CO2 in the atmosphere was about 5000 parts per million! Our evergreen trees and shrubs evolved about 360 million years ago, with CO2 levels at about 4000 ppm. When our deciduous trees evolved about 160 million years ago, the C02 level was about 2200 ppm—still five times the current level.
Source: When Too Little CO2 Nearly Doomed Humanity – Dennis Avery
Articles: Academic Global Warming Advocates and the Power of Incoherent Jargon
Certainly it is a worthy thing to study ways to provide security and resilience for our cities. However, if you start with an unchallenged belief in imaginary global warming, you are going to end up making things worse. Substituting wind or solar power for conventional power plants does not provide greater energy security, for obvious reasons. Worrying about fashionable, imaginary water shortages distracts from real urban problems such as crime or broken families. Worrying about food security is fairly comical given the obesity epidemic.
Source: Articles: Academic Global Warming Advocates and the Power of Incoherent Jargon
The Pseudo-Science of Microaggressions | National Association of Scholars
The problem is, when Sue, Solórzano, and other critical race researchers reject “Eurocentric epistemologies” and “objectivity” they reject the methodology and standards of modern science (e.g., use of a comparison group, sufficient sample size, unbiased questions, replicability of results, use of modern statistical analysis). Instead, critical race theorists value “experiential knowledge” (e.g., the narrative). Such storytelling enables the implementation of a highly politicized agenda and places a social change agenda above objective social science research. It also makes it significantly easier to “prove” the prevalence of microaggressions on campus.
Most important, the critical race paradigm logically and unreflectively results in a one-way analysis pervasive in these studies, which all start with this premise: that microaggressions can only be perceived by non-whites but are only committed by whites. In other words, whites’ perceptions are invalid.
Source: The Pseudo-Science of Microaggressions | National Association of Scholars