Morning Eye Candy
Sorry to tell you, but…. – Op-Eds – Arutz Sheva
“The Palestine Liberation Movement (Fatah) was founded, may I remind you, in 1959 and The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) in 1964, years before the 1967 “occupation” that was a result of Israel winning the Six Day War.”
When Pieties Collide | City Journal
“It’d be great if we could take rape, sexual assault and structural misogyny as seriously every day as we do when migrants and Muslims are involved as perpetrators,” she wrote. Penny did not provide any examples of daily mass sexual assaults committed by Westerners.
The New Normal | The Z Blog
“Notice that expelling the Muslims is not an option? Notice that repelling the Muslims is never an option. Instead, we have to just accept this “new normal” where strange men with beards suddenly explode in public places.”
Source: The New Normal | The Z Blog
Barbara Kay: When Mark Steyn struck back
Steyn slowly rose and riposted, in a tone of withering contempt, “I wasn’t going to do funny stuff. I was going to be deadly serious. (But) I’m slightly amazed at Simon’s ability to get big laughs on gang rape.” Vigorous applause. He went on, “Mme Arbour scoffs at the ‘newfound feminists.’ I’m not much of a feminist, but I draw the line at a three year old … and a seven year old getting raped.” Vigorous applause.
Atheists lose case, still demand demolition of WWI memorial
But “Islam has for centuries recoiled at the image of the cross, considering it a form of blasphemy. Muslims do not believe Jesus Christ is the Son of God, nor do they believe he died on a Roman cross for the salvation of mankind.”
Source: Atheists lose case, still demand demolition of WWI memorial
Magic Honky Theory | The Z Blog
In the case of ex-cons, putting them in with the law abiding will magically rehabilitate them. This is the Magic Honky Theory. Stand close enough to the white guys and you start to act white.
Source: Magic Honky Theory | The Z Blog
Bookworm Room – Conservatives deal with facts and reach conclusions; liberals have conclusions and sell them as facts.
Incidentally, a friend of mine came up with a wonderful scenario for the first debate against Hillary. (In his and my fantasy, Cruz has managed to win the convention. This fantasy would work for Trump, but less well than for Cruz, because Trump is also up to his neck in that swampy intersection between politics and business as usual.)
Here’s the fantasy:Cruz walks out on the stage and announces, “I do not understand why this woman is standing there. Solely on the evidence available, we know that she’s broken myriad very serious federal laws and that she’s substantially harmed national security. In a just nation, she would be indicted and, perhaps, even on her way to prison by now. Instead, we’ve become a nation with two sets of laws — one, a harsh one, for ordinary Americans; and another one, a disgracefully lax one, for those politically connected to the ruling Democrat party. I can tell you here and now that, in a Cruz administration, the law will apply equally to all Americans.”
Relationships
