The left argument simply assumes that the “popular vote” in the aggregate nationally is, or at least ought to be, the standard by which the presidential election is judged to be legitimate; anything else is illegitimate and “unrepresentative”, and the Senate inherently so. But there was never any intention to have “one man, one vote” be the appropriate standard of legitimacy on the national level as it was at more local levels. The founders wanted to force a widespread consensus across a whole collection of local majorities to balance different interests. This prevents ten or a dozen urban aggregations (NY, LA, SF, Chicago…) from dominating without having to balance other interests. The “popular vote” in the aggregate nationally is just a journalistic construct that is entirely extra-constitutional.
End the misery
‘We’re Coming For You’: Illiberal Left Goes Bananas Over Kavanaugh
So, to recap: These are people who accost other humans in restaurants and hallways, attack restaurants for the political ideas of the customers who eat in them, claw at the doors of the Supreme Court when they don’t get their way, threaten to release medical information about senators’ children in retaliation for facing the consequences of losing a free and fair election, face polls turning upside down on them by doubling down on these kinds of tactics — oh, yes, and send shock squads to assassinate the character and terrorize the family of anyone who thinks differently as racists, murderers, and rapists. All this while insisting through clenched teeth that they are the party of tolerance, love, and empathy.
The word for this is:
Source: ‘We’re Coming For You’: Illiberal Left Goes Bananas Over Kavanaugh
The IPCC is still wrong on climate change. Scientists prove it.
The IPCC is a political organization, not a scientific body. It was formed by the United Nations in 1988 for the purpose of establishing the need for a global solution to the alleged problem of anthropogenic climate change. Note that the mission of the IPCC was never to study the causes of climate change; were that the case, it might have devoted some of its billions of dollars in revenues over the years to examining solar cycles, changes in ocean currents, the sensitivity of climate to greenhouse gases, or the planet’s carbon cycle. The IPCC has spent trivial sums on these issues, and the authors of and contributors to its voluminous reports have few or no credentials in these fields.
Fake scientists.
Source: The IPCC is still wrong on climate change. Scientists prove it.
HUNGARIAN FOREIGN MINISTER shocks CNN journalist by saying “We reject multiculturalism”
She then argued that the Hungarian government is wrong, and that Hungary has no “immigration problem”. She pointed out that of Hungary’s 10 million inhabitants there are less than 4,000 refugees, that the country has no major crime and that no terrorist attacks have occurred.
Oddly, she fails to understand that the reason for the low level of crime and absence of terrorism is the direct the result of NO MUSLIM IMMIGRATION.
Amen. These are not ‘refugees’. These are hostile invaders. They need to be met with force.
Source: HUNGARIAN FOREIGN MINISTER shocks CNN journalist by saying “We reject multiculturalism”
MAGA!
A Short History of American Medical Insurance – Imprimis
The second dislocation was that hospital insurance did not provide indemnity coverage, which is when the insurance company pays for a loss and the customer decides how best to deal with it. Rather than indemnification, the insurance company provided service benefits. In other words, it paid the bill for services covered by the policy, whatever the bill was. As a result, there was little incentive for the consumer of medical services to shop around. With someone else paying, patients quickly became relatively indifferent to the cost of medical care.
Source: A Short History of American Medical Insurance – Imprimis
Doofus Of The Day #1,027
Who would be dumb enough to think of a design like this? I can tell you right now that almost every cop of my acquaintance (and I’ve worked with a lot of them) would be ready for trouble as soon as he saw it. He might not draw his gun at first, but if he saw you pull that out of your pocket with no visible reason to do so – before he noticed the cellphone attached to it – he might not wait to ask you politely what you were doing. Action beats reaction, and he’s not going to wait until someone aims what looks just like a gun at him.
Source: Bayou Renaissance Man
The Practice of Ritual Defamation
An important rule in ritual defamation is to avoid engaging in any kind of debate over the truthfulness or reasonableness of what has been expressed, only condemn it. To debate opens the issue up for examination and discussion of its merits, and to consider the evidence that may support it, which is just what the ritual defamer is trying to avoid. The primary goal of a ritual defamation is censorship and repression.
This is the third item out of eight in the list.
Pinterest jumps on the censorship bandwagon
So my Islam/Muslim Pinterest board was deleted today. Guess Pinterest is pro-savagery and anti-American. There is no such thing as ‘hate speech.’ Find me the legal definition of it. There is a legal definition of freedom of speech. Pinterest is against the legal definition of speech.