A doctor’s commitment to medicine is one thing. A commitment to involuntary servitude demanded by their fellow Americans is quite another.
Category: Government
Me
The Constitution establishes liberty. Freedom. It doesn’t establish liberal ‘fairness’. The American Revolution was about liberty and freedom. Contrast that with the French Revolution, which was about equality and fairness.
The French Revolution, equality and fairness required so many heads of state that they invented the guillotine to keep up with the demand.
Free To Not Be Around You | The Z Blog
If it is acceptable for Americans to say “no” to Muslims on the grounds that we don’t want any more Muslims, then we’re back to discussing the limits, if there are any, to the freedom of association. Put another way, if we don’t need a reason to say “no” to Mohamed, then we don’t need to ask for permission in order to say “no” to diversity.
The Ugly Truth about Muslim Grievances | Frontpage Mag
This is not the sort of grievance that animates many Muslims – and certainly not those who resort to terrorism.
Rather, they are animated by a supremacist-based grievance: they get angry seeing infidels on an equal footing with Muslims. And they get murderous seeing infidels actually lording over Muslims.
Source: The Ugly Truth about Muslim Grievances | Frontpage Mag
Justice and “Social Justice” Are Two Very Different Things | Mises Wire
Americans cannot have both liberty and this type of social justice — under whose aegis one can assert rights to be provided education and health care, not to mention food, housing, etc. Positive rights to receive such things, absent an obligation to earn them, must violate others’ liberty, because a government must take citizens’ resources without their consent to fund them. Providing such government benefits for some forcibly violates others’ rights to themselves and their property.
Source: Justice and “Social Justice” Are Two Very Different Things | Mises Wire
Obvious
Articles: Church, State, and Melania Trump
We have drifted a long way from the Founding Fathers’ clear intent about the relationship between the free exercise of religion and government. People are no longer free to apply their religious beliefs to their businesses, as the vendetta against Hobby Lobby demonstrates. The Obama administration went to court to force the Little Sister of the Poor to provide contraceptive coverage to their workers. Bakers were forced to bake cakes for gay weddings in violation of their religious beliefs.
Articles: A Brief and Appalling History of the Department of Education
There has never been a constitutional basis for any federal control over education in the states.
Source: Articles: A Brief and Appalling History of the Department of Education
Articles: What Rights Will the Left Take Away (or Make Up) Next?
As the list demonstrates, nearly every “right” the left imposes actually requires that someone else do something or give up something, foisting a form of servitude on someone else.
Servitude. Slavery. Same thing Democrats have always stood for.
Source: Articles: What Rights Will the Left Take Away (or Make Up) Next?
We Need A Tom Doniphon | The Z Blog
All the blather about America being a nation of laws is just cover for the fact that ours is a lawless nation ruled by lawless men. An obvious example is the Ninth Circuit judges, who have fabricated a legal justification for throwing sand in the gears of a wildly popular executive order issued by President Trump. These are not men enforcing the law or respecting the laws. These are men who hold the law in contempt. All that matters to them is obedience to the weird secular cult we have come to call Progressivism.