Canada took them during Vietnam. Why not now?
Source: Canadians Don’t Want America-Fleeing Liberals (Especially Lena Dunham) |Heat Street
Canada took them during Vietnam. Why not now?
Source: Canadians Don’t Want America-Fleeing Liberals (Especially Lena Dunham) |Heat Street
“No American president has taken an oath on a bible in over a decade, all that the governor meant was that he would keep both Christians and Muslims in mind as the people of Allah when he takes his oath to protect and defend the Sharia,” Aisha Zubedi said.
Source: Sultan Knish: Election 2048 – Under the Peace of Islam
Her followers have also made their presence and their awful potential known. We have seen them in Occupy camps, in race riots, in vicious attacks on whites that are ignored, in purposeful incitement to violence at political rallies, in bombings of Republican political offices, and in the mounting murder figures in every city controlled by her political party.
Source: Articles: At Risk Is Nothing Less Than the Right Ever to Resist Again
One of the bedrock principles of Anglo-Saxon conservatism was the belief that all people have a right to associate with whoever they wish…
This presents a problem for fanatics as people have the ability to ignore them by refusing to be around them. The gays that go around harassing Christian bakers, for example, are simply using the power of the state to force themselves into the lives of those who would otherwise ignore them.
Source: You’re Not Welcome | The Z Blog
Source: Dead Puppies
ISIS is not un-Islamic. It is ruthlessly and uncompromisingly Islamic in that, unlike its predecessors in the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda, it makes the fewest compromises to civilizational sensibilities.
Source: Sultan Knish: What Will Replace ISIS?
Left-wing students at the University of California, Berkeley are protesting again. This time, however, these students are calling for “safe spaces” for transgendered people, as well as “spaces of color” at the University
Source: Going back to their roots | Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
But like many other liberal power-enabling concepts, those perpetrating it intend to repeat it so often that it becomes accepted by a majority of Americans. But it cannot survive constitutional scrutiny for the simple reason that in order to accept the censorship authority of person A, one has to disqualify the censorship authority of person B. Simply put, this implies that one person’s feeling of being offended has value, and everyone else’s doesn’t.
Source: Articles: Censoring Language as Offensive Violates the Constitution